I’ve used both cameras on several projects, not to mention the countless tedious tests for this guide.
In my initial review, I said I felt the a7R II is the better deal overall, and if stills are a big part of your business, it is. Also, the a7R II does give you 4K in APS-C mode, so that counts for a lot.
However, as of this writing, for video, I prefer the Sony a7S II, for these reasons:
- S-Log3 is easier to use, and you can preserve your highlights.
- The a7R II is sharper, but the resolution of the a7S II is acceptable.
- It has better Zebra options for exposure control.
- Low light.
To be honest, Sony was very clever in separating these two products. It actually makes sense to own both of them. You can match them when you have to, and use them individually when the other will not work.
I find this situation frustrating and sad. But it is what it is. I am keeping both cameras of course.
- I need the a7R II for photography and APS-C mode while shooting documentaries.
- I need the a7S II for video in S-Log3 and for low light situations.
Just for fun though, if you forced me to pick one camera only, which one would it be? I stick by what I said in my review, I’d pick the a7R II.
With the a7S II, I feel I’ve been conned. Who needs that when you’ve spent $3,000?
