Why it takes half as long to make a movie today than 50 years ago


As a fun exercise, here's a look at how long it took for a few great movies to complete principal photography.

First, the video:

This is a fun exercise, a proper study is required. Here are the major errors in this data:

  • It only accounts for 10 films per year.
  • The filming dates are from IMDb or Wikipedia and might be wrong.
  • I could have made errors counting days (error of ±5 days).
  • The filming dates might not include breaks or gaps in the shooting schedule.
  • It doesn’t account for the number of hours shot per day. A more accurate estimate is from the number of hours shot.
  • I’ve tried to mix low budget films and big blockbusters, but the sheer variety of films made per year was not taken into account.
  • It does not take into account action vs dialogue scenes, etc.
  • It does not take into account the movie’s running length, or shooting ratio (how much was shot vs thrown away).
  • The problem is compounded because there’s relatively more accurate data for recent films over older films.
  • The equipment and type of shooting was different over the ages.
  • And on and on and on.

So let me stress again this is not a scientific study, nor a definitive statement. But I thought the results are interesting so I’d share. Maybe a film school could take on the challenge and publish the data.

First the films. I’ve chosen ‘great’ films as recommended by Google search, of which filming dates were available. I thought keeping it random like this would improve the odds of accuracy. Bias can still creep in, because Google never recommends the same thing to everybody.

Here’s the complete list:

1920s

#TitleReleasedShot (approx.)Approx. Days
1The Birth of a Nation1915191490
2The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari1920191930
3Nosferatu1922192160
4Ben Hur19251924660
5Faust19261925180
6The General19261925100
7Metropolis19271926510
8The Jazz Singer1927192660
9The Cameraman1928192774
10Un Chien Andalou1929192855

1930s

1Frankenstein1931193040
2City Lights19311930180
3M1931193042
4Freaks1932193124
5It Happened One Night1934193340
6L’Atalante19341933120
7Gone with the Wind19391938330
8The Rules of the Game1939193890
9Mr. Smith Goes to Washington1939193894
10The Grapes of Wrath1939193844
11The Great Dictator19401939539
There are eleven here because I did one extra and didn’t have the heart to remove any of these films.

1940s

1Citizen Kane19411940115
2How Green Was My Valley1941194064
3Casablanca1942194175
4The Magnificient Ambersons1942194184
5Double Indemnity1944194357
6It’s a Wonderful Life19461945102
7The Big Sleep1946194592
8Notorious19461945100
9The Treasure of the Sierra Madre19481947165
10The Third Man1949194842

1950s

1Singin’ in the Rain19521951156
2On the Waterfront1954195369
3Rebel Without a Cause1955195458
412 Angry Men1957195621
5The Bridge on the River Kwai19571956165
6Touch of Evil1958195742
7Vertigo1958195745
8Ben-Hur19591958240
9Some Like it Hot1959195892
10Psycho1960195980

1960s

1Breakfast at Tiffany’s19611960120
2Lawrence of Arabia19621961126
3Sound of Music19651964155
4Blow-up1966196590
5The Graduate19671966120
6Bonnie and Clyde1967196688
7Rosemary’s Baby19681967105
8Night of the Living Dead19681967180
9Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid19691968120
10Midnight Cowboy19691968126

1970s

1The Godfather19721971100
2Chinatown1974197390
3Barry Lyndon19751974240
4Jaws19751974159
5Rocky1976197555
6Halloween1978197721
7The Deer Hunter19781977195
8Apocalypse Now19791978238
9Alien1979197898
10Friday the 13th1980197930

1980s

1Raiders of the Lost Ark19811980120
2The Evil Dead1981198072
3The Thing1982198184
4Blade Runner1982198190
5ET1982198188
6Nightmare on Elm Street1984198332
7Aliens19861985150
8Dirty Dancing1987198652
9Do the Right Thing1989198855
10Goodfellas19901989100

1990s

1Reservoir Dogs1992199133
2Schindler’s List1993199273
3Pulp Fiction1994199351
4Forrest Gump19941993138
5Seven1995199455
6Before Sunrise1995199433
7Titanic19971996235
8Psycho remake1998199752
9Fight Club19991998138
10The Sixth Sense1999199852

2000s

1Ocean’s Eleven20012000115
2The Royal Tenenbaums2001200090
3Catch Me if You Can2002200152
4Napoleon Dynamite2004200325
5Million Dollar Baby2004200340
6Little Miss Sunshine2006200530
7The Departed20062005127
8The Devil Wears Prada2006200557
9Iron Man20082007102
10The Dark Knight20082007200

2010s

1Drive2011201048
2Zero Dark Thirty2012201188
3Dallas Buyers Club2013201225
4The Guardians of the Galaxy2014201392
5The Hateful Eight20152014137
6La La Land2016201530
7Get Out2017201623
8Us2019201867
9Once Upon a Time in Hollywood20192018133
10The Irishman20192018108

Movie schedules over the decades

Now here’s a summary, per decade:

DecadeAverage (<100 days)Total average
1920s67182
1930s53140
1940s7790
1950s5897
1960s94123
1970s66123
1980s7284
1990s5086
2000s5784
2010s6075
Grand Average65 days108 days

I’ve made two averages. One is the total, taking into account all films in that decade. The second is the average of movies that have a schedule less than 110 days. This eliminates those movies that took too long.

Here’s a graphical representation:

Pay attention to the blue line.

Does it take half as long to make a movie today than 50 years ago?

As I write this, it’s 2020. Fifty years ago it was 1970. As you can see, the average was almost twice (not exactly, but different enough for fun’s sake).

Did film directors in the 1960s-70s have a greater luxury in terms of shooting schedules? Let’s take a couple of examples.

Psycho

Psycho is a very instructive example because both Psychos (1961 vs 1997) are almost shot by shot copies. It should have taken roughly the same amount of time to shoot both. Hitchcock didn’t waste time on a film set!

But Psycho (1961) took 80 days to shoot. Psycho (1998) took 52 days to shoot. Assuming the data is accurate, that’s a huge difference.

https://website-39341349.tnb.awf.mybluehost.me/how-alfred-hitchcock-scared-everyone-without-moving-the-camera/

Why should this be so? Cameras were lighter, lights were lighter. What about budgets?

MovieOriginal BudgetBudget in 2020 dollars
Psycho (1961)$806,947$7,027,990
Psycho (1998)$60,000,000$96,372,710

The newer Psycho had a huge budget, even accounting for inflation. More than 10 times!!! If you account the cost per shooting day it’s even higher.

Let’s take another example.

Ben-Hur

Ben-Hur (1925) took 660 days. Ben-Hur (1959) took 240 days. Assuming the data is accurate, that’s three times the difference.

Here are the budgets:

MovieOriginal BudgetBudget in 2020 dollars
Ben-Hur (1925)$4 million$60,303,391
Ben-Hur (1959)$15 million$133,804,671

That’s twice the difference, but one-third the shooting dates!

Let me stress again the we need a lot more data to generalize, but for fun’s sake I’m going to do it anyway and say movies used to take a lot longer to make – maybe because it was cheaper.

Filmmakers could afford to spend more time. Actors gave more time. Crew unions charged lesser. Locations were cheaper, transportation and food was cheaper. There were no computers or visual effects. Sound and music was cheaper.

How long should an average movie take to film?

Keep in mind this is just about principal photography. There’s pre-production before and post production after.

It seems the gold standard is around the 60-day mark. Over the decades that hasn’t changed all that much.

A 90-100 minute film should take about 60 days to make, on average. That’s 1.5 script pages a day.

Of course, for low budget films this time is halved.

A 90-minute low budget film should take about 30 days to make, on average. That’s 3 script pages a day.

And, if you really want to make a movie like the big directors, you might have to go longer.

A 90-150 minute film can take 100 days to make, if you really want to indulge like they did in the 60s and 70s.

Note these movies:

1Breakfast at Tiffany’s19611960120
4Blow-up1966196590
5The Graduate19671966120
6Bonnie and Clyde1967196688
7Rosemary’s Baby19681967105
8Night of the Living Dead19681967180
9Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid19691968120
10Midnight Cowboy19691968126

Some of the movies have action scenes, but nothing extraordinary. Night of the Living Dead took long because of money issues. Putting that aside, you’d think these movies should only have taken 60 days according to today’s standards.

But the directors were lucky to get about 100 days on average. Again, this is going by the data and hoping it is accurate.

Now let’s look at the reverse and look at these movies from the last 10-20 years:

Catch Me if You Can2002200152
Iron Man20082007102
The Guardians of the Galaxy2014201392
The Irishman20192018108

Marvel movies, with their enormous budgets, are getting done in about 100 days. It shows how efficient they are at production. They should really have an Oscar for production.

https://website-39341349.tnb.awf.mybluehost.me/the-marvel-cinematic-language-explained/

And finally, note how fast Spielberg shoots:

MovieDays
Jaws159 days
Raiders of the Lost Ark120 days
Schindler’s List73 days
Jurassic Park96 days
Catch Me if You Can52 days
Minority Report115 days
Munich90 days
Lincoln60 days

Jaws had tons of problems, but over the years his production unit works at a blistering pace.

Why it takes half as long to make a movie today than 50 years ago

I can only make guesses:

  • You can roll for longer with digital cameras, so you can shoot faster and more per day.
  • Cameras have become lighter and a lot cheaper, so you can have multiple cameras on set to cover all kinds of scenes.
  • Films are a lot costlier to make due to astronomical labour costs.
  • Locations are expensive. People know they can charge the big bucks if they have a good location.
  • Actors charge too much, though that’s reducing nowadays.
  • Markets have shrunk and competition is fierce, so studios need to cut costs.
  • Marketing and advertising costs have skyrocketed due to social media costs and the additional manpower it takes to handle this behemoth.
  • And here’s the worst: The perceived worth of a feature film has fallen dramatically. E.g., if a streaming platform charges $9.99 per month, and you watch one movie a day, that’s $0.03 per movie. If you want one movie a week that’s $2.50. One movie a month? Still only $9.99. And you’re competing with a library of content that just gets bigger and bigger…and bigger.

As far as I understand it, the indulgent filmmaking style is really tough on the wallet, no matter what kind of producer you are. And the falling perceived worth of a film is the nail in the coffin.

Today, asking for more than 30 days means you have major stars or the marketing muscle to get noticed in all this noise.

What do you think?

Author Bio
Photo of author
Sareesh Sudhakaran is a film director and award-winning cinematographer with over 24 years of experience. His second film, "Gin Ke Dus", was released in theaters in India in March 2024. As an educator, Sareesh walks the talk. His online courses help aspiring filmmakers realize their filmmaking dreams. Sareesh is also available for hire on your film!

6 thoughts on “Why it takes half as long to make a movie today than 50 years ago”

  1. Sareesh,
    I have been a full time professional still photographer for over 50 years. For many years i made enough money to rase 3 children buy a home and a studio building. In about 2006 I could see what digital photography, ie cell phones and the relative cheep very good quality fully automated digital cameras were doing to the professional photographer. One by one most of my very good commercial accosts were being taken over by in house staff that could operate a pretty good DSLR camera. Even my video training films went to in-house staff using an inexpensive camcorders. In short the perceived value of almost all types of media has been devalued by the glut of easy to make and have available for personal use .
    I sold almost all my contract school photography contracts to a large national school picture company in 2007. This was a very good move for me. Very much fo the most profitable part of that business has disappeared Much the same problems affect the movie industry. I still love and am passionate about making ll types of images still and moving! I just don’t make a hole lot of money now.

    Reply
    • Thank you for sharing your story, Danny. Today the wedding industry is probably the only one left with a decent margin.

      Reply
  2. Like when a student is asked to write an answer to a question.. if it is a 5 mark question, he will write it in 50 words, and if it is 15 mark question, he would elaborate it.. In a similar way, a story can be told in grand scale, and even in a small scale. It is director’s capability to get that marketing muscle to make a film of 15 mark, rather than the film actually requires… Just an opinion.. I liked your video…

    Reply
  3. Thanks sareesh,
    What a cool topic to talk about.
    I’ve seen most of the films you reference for timings and most of them you can kind of see why they would take less time with the dialogue vs action argument.
    Catch me if you can seems like a fast paced film with a lot of locations and movement but really it’s dialogue heavy and contain locations that could all be booked logically and shot fast. I guess it really is down to dialogue being faster to shoot than action. I wonder if the action lines per film data would follow the production days graph accurately?

    Reply

Leave a Comment