Panasonic S5 II vs Canon R6 Mark II vs Sony A7 IV. Which is the better camera for filmmaking?


Here's a fun comparison. Which camera offers more value - Sony a7 IV, the Canon R6 Mark II or the Panasonic S5 II?

Let’s compare the new ready-to-compete Panasonic S5 II (AmazonB&H) with the Canon R6 Mark II (Amazon, B&H) and the Sony A7 IV (Amazon, B&H).

All three mirrorless cameras in this comparison are within a price range of $2,000 to $2,500. Which one is a better investment for serious filmmakers?

Let’s find out with this fun comparison.

Autofocus comparison

The newly released Panasonic S5 II has phase hybrid autofocus with 779 AF points. The Sony A7 IV has a fast hybrid phase detection autofocus with 759 AF points. The Canon R6 Mark II has Advanced Dual Pixel CMOS II autofocus with 1053 AF points.

Does that mean the Canon is better? In most tests I’ve seen the Canon R6 Mark II (Amazon, B&H) outperforms the Sony A7 IV (Amazon, B&H), while the Panasonic S5 II (AmazonB&H) falls behind.

In real-life situations, especially in low light, all of these cameras fail and are not dependable for serious filmmaking work. You can get by with vlogs, but not actor movement.

Once we get our hands on the Panasonic S5 II we’ll be in a better position to judge.

Quick menu

Comparison of sensors and video features

Here’s how the camera sensors compare for video:

CameraResolutionMaximum FPS*Video ISO Range
Panasonic S5 II5952 × 396830 fps (60 fps)*100-51200 | 640-51200 in V-Log#
Sony A7 IV3840 x 2160 / 7032 x 395860p/30p^100-51200 | 800-51200 in S-Log3
Canon R6 Mark II3840 x 2160 60p^^100-25600 | 800-25600 in C-Log3

*Maximum fps in 4K is 60 fps. At 6K the maximum fps is 30 fps.

^7K oversampling is possible when recording in 4K 30p.

^^6K oversampling possible in 4K in Canon R6 Mark II

#The Panasonic S5 II (AmazonB&H) has dual native ISO at ISO 640 and ISO 4000 in V-Log.

What about 4K frame rates?

CameraMax fps at 4KDynamic RangeMax fps at 1080p
Panasonic S5 II60 fps*14+ stops120 fps
Sony A7 IV60 fps*15+ stops240 fps
Canon R6 Mark II60 fps14 stops180 fps

*In APS-C/Super35mm mode. You don’t get 60p in full frame mode, unfortunately.

All three cameras have something to brag about. While the Canon R6 Mark II (Amazon, B&H) has 60p in full frame mode the Sony A7 IV (Amazon, B&H) has oversampled video and 240 fps in 1080p. The Panasonic S5 II (AmazonB&H) has 6K video and a lower ISO in log mode.

Next, the codecs and color information:

CameraRAW and Code in 4K and HigherColor Information
Canon R6 Mark IIProres RAW | H.264/H.265 ALL-IRAW | 10-bit 4:2:2/8-bit 4:2:0
Sony A7 IVProres RAW | H.264/H.265 ALL-I, IPBRAW | 10-bit 4:2:2/8-bit 4:2:0
Panasonic S5 IIProRes RAW* | H.264/H.265 ALL-I, IPBRAW | 10-bit 4:2:2/8-bit 4:2:0^

*It’s a paid future firmware upgrade using Software Upgrade Key DMW-SFU2 (S5II).

^10-bit 4:2:0 in 6K 30p, 10-bit 4:2:2 in 4K 60p.

Nowadays 10-bit 4:2:2 in 4K is a given, and all three cameras give us that.

The Panasonic S5 II (AmazonB&H) and Canon R6 Mark II (Amazon, B&H) have fast USB 3.2 Gen 2 readout speeds if you’re transferring data that way.

If you want the best Prores RAW output possible you might want to invest in an Atomos Ninja V+ (Amazon, B&H):

Focus and exposure aids and ergonomics

What’s the point of RAW if you can’t expose it correctly? The little things make all the difference:

CameraExposure
Panasonic S5 IIWaveform, Zebras, Histogram, Meter
Canon R6 Mark II Zebras, Histogram, Meter
Sony A7 IVZebras, Histogram, Meter

Here the Panasonic S5 II (AmazonB&H) wins with the waveform monitor. Panasonic has always been ahead of the game in this regard.

All three have similar OLED viewfinders and LCDs and in real-world shoots I don’t think it will matter all that much.

The Panasonic S5 II (AmazonB&H) has a built-in heat dispersion fan system for longer duration recording. The camera will still overheat in modes above 4K. Modes above 4K also have a recording limit of 30 minutes, while in 4K there is no recording limit. This means two things:

  1. More power draw due to the fan
  2. More weight due to the fan
CameraHDMI PortWeight (with card and battery)
Panasonic S5 IIType A740g
Sony A7 IVType A658g
Canon R6 Mark IIType D670g

For other details like menu, usability, buttons, etc., I’ll have to get my hands on the S5 II to learn more. However, all three camera systems have evolved to better menus and operability over the last few years so I think you’ll be okay with either.

Image Stabilization

All three cameras have 5-axis image stabilization with the best performance coming from native lenses. Without a thorough test it’s hard to say which is better, though from initial reports it seems the Panasonic S5 II (AmazonB&H), being the most modern system, is also the best.

Batteries and media cards

Here’s a look at the media:

CameraDual card slotsPrice per GB for 512 GB*
Panasonic S5 IIYes, SDHC/SDXC, UHS-II$0.63/GB
Sony A7 IVYes, CFexpress Type A or UHS-II SD Card$2.49/GB and $0.63/GB
Canon R6 Mark IIYes, SDHC/SDXC, UHS-II$0.63/GB

CFexpress cards are not cheap (comparing Sandisk Extreme Pro to be fair). For practical shoots, you will need multiple cards. This could really add to your budget. With the Sony a7 IV, you can use CFExpress or UHS-II, which is a huge relief.

What about battery life?

CameraBattery lifeCost one one batteryCost of 6 hours of operation
Panasonic S5 II45 minutes$67.50$540
Sony A7 IV110 minutes$78$255
Canon R6 II120 minutes$79$237

The added fan also increases power draw and this affects the S5 II.

Which is cheaper to own?

Let’s just add up the costs:

CameraSony A7 IVPanasonic S5 IICanon R6 Mark II
Camera body$2,498$1,999$2,499
Media and AccessoriesTieTieTie
Batteries$255$540$237
Total$2,753$2539$2,736

The S5 II looked cheaper, but with added battery usage the gap is narrower. Now you know why we’re comparing the three.

Recap

Who wins each feature?

FeatureWinner
Sensor and ISOSony A7 IV
Video featuresSony A7 IV
DR and ColorSony A7 IV
Rolling ShutterTBD
Exposure AidsPanasonic S5 II
MediaTie
LensesTie
ErgonomicsTBD
Ports and MonitoringPanasonic S5 II
AudioTie
AutofocusCanon R6 Mark II
Battery lifeTie

Before we take our final decision, we’ll let the cameras tell us what they offer that the others don’t:

CameraUSPMajor Cons
Panasonic SS IIUnlimited recording time in 4KBattery life, weight, cost of lenses
Canon R6 Mark II4K 60p in Full frame Overheating
Sony A7 IV7K oversampled, 240 fps in 1080p, low light performanceOverheating

My Verdict

I said I’ll try to provide a balanced overview, even though it’s hard. Here’s what I think:

Type of FilmmakingPreferred CameraMajor Reasons
Documentaries and corporate videosSony A7 IVLow light performance, battery life and 240 fps
Short or feature filmsCanon R6 Mark IIFull frame in 4K and 60 fps
Music VideosSony A7 IVLow light performance, battery life and 240 fps
JournalismSony A7 IVLow light performance, battery life and 240 fps
WildlifeSony A7 IVLow light performance, battery life and 240 fps
Weddings and EventsSony A7 IVLow light performance, battery life and 240 fps

Even though the Canon R6 Mark II (Amazon, B&H) leads the Sony A7 IV (Amazon, B&H) in fictional work, the gap is a lot narrower if you don’t care about full frame mode in 60p.

The Panasonic S5 II (AmazonB&H), with all its advancements, falls behind, unfortunately. It’s probably a capable camera, but I can’t recommend it over the other two.

Overall, the Sony A7 IV (Amazon, B&H) wins.

What do you think?

Author Bio
Photo of author

4 thoughts on “Panasonic S5 II vs Canon R6 Mark II vs Sony A7 IV. Which is the better camera for filmmaking?”

  1. Great comparison and detailed explanations. Thank you for actually picking a ‘winner’ – a lot of reviewers ‘chicken out’ and say “it depends”. Appreciate the time and effort you put into these comparisons.

    Reply

Leave a Comment