Let’s compare the new ready-to-compete Panasonic S5 II (Amazon, B&H) with the Canon R6 Mark II (Amazon, B&H) and the Sony A7 IV (Amazon, B&H).
All three mirrorless cameras in this comparison are within a price range of $2,000 to $2,500. Which one is a better investment for serious filmmakers?
Let’s find out with this fun comparison.
Autofocus comparison
The newly released Panasonic S5 II has phase hybrid autofocus with 779 AF points. The Sony A7 IV has a fast hybrid phase detection autofocus with 759 AF points. The Canon R6 Mark II has Advanced Dual Pixel CMOS II autofocus with 1053 AF points.
Does that mean the Canon is better? In most tests I’ve seen the Canon R6 Mark II (Amazon, B&H) outperforms the Sony A7 IV (Amazon, B&H), while the Panasonic S5 II (Amazon, B&H) falls behind.
In real-life situations, especially in low light, all of these cameras fail and are not dependable for serious filmmaking work. You can get by with vlogs, but not actor movement.
Once we get our hands on the Panasonic S5 II we’ll be in a better position to judge.
Quick menu
- Comparison of sensors and video features
- Exposure, focus and ergonomics
- The costs of media and batteries
- Which is cheapest to own?
- Verdict. Who wins?
Comparison of sensors and video features
Here’s how the camera sensors compare for video:
| Camera | Resolution | Maximum FPS* | Video ISO Range |
| Panasonic S5 II | 5952 × 3968 | 30 fps (60 fps)* | 100-51200 | 640-51200 in V-Log# |
| Sony A7 IV | 3840 x 2160 / 7032 x 3958 | 60p/30p^ | 100-51200 | 800-51200 in S-Log3 |
| Canon R6 Mark II | 3840 x 2160 | 60p^^ | 100-25600 | 800-25600 in C-Log3 |
*Maximum fps in 4K is 60 fps. At 6K the maximum fps is 30 fps.
^7K oversampling is possible when recording in 4K 30p.
^^6K oversampling possible in 4K in Canon R6 Mark II
#The Panasonic S5 II (Amazon, B&H) has dual native ISO at ISO 640 and ISO 4000 in V-Log.
What about 4K frame rates?
| Camera | Max fps at 4K | Dynamic Range | Max fps at 1080p |
| Panasonic S5 II | 60 fps* | 14+ stops | 120 fps |
| Sony A7 IV | 60 fps* | 15+ stops | 240 fps |
| Canon R6 Mark II | 60 fps | 14 stops | 180 fps |
*In APS-C/Super35mm mode. You don’t get 60p in full frame mode, unfortunately.
All three cameras have something to brag about. While the Canon R6 Mark II (Amazon, B&H) has 60p in full frame mode the Sony A7 IV (Amazon, B&H) has oversampled video and 240 fps in 1080p. The Panasonic S5 II (Amazon, B&H) has 6K video and a lower ISO in log mode.
Next, the codecs and color information:
| Camera | RAW and Code in 4K and Higher | Color Information |
| Canon R6 Mark II | Prores RAW | H.264/H.265 ALL-I | RAW | 10-bit 4:2:2/8-bit 4:2:0 |
| Sony A7 IV | Prores RAW | H.264/H.265 ALL-I, IPB | RAW | 10-bit 4:2:2/8-bit 4:2:0 |
| Panasonic S5 II | ProRes RAW* | H.264/H.265 ALL-I, IPB | RAW | 10-bit 4:2:2/8-bit 4:2:0^ |
*It’s a paid future firmware upgrade using Software Upgrade Key DMW-SFU2 (S5II).
^10-bit 4:2:0 in 6K 30p, 10-bit 4:2:2 in 4K 60p.
Nowadays 10-bit 4:2:2 in 4K is a given, and all three cameras give us that.
The Panasonic S5 II (Amazon, B&H) and Canon R6 Mark II (Amazon, B&H) have fast USB 3.2 Gen 2 readout speeds if you’re transferring data that way.
If you want the best Prores RAW output possible you might want to invest in an Atomos Ninja V+ (Amazon, B&H):

Focus and exposure aids and ergonomics
What’s the point of RAW if you can’t expose it correctly? The little things make all the difference:
| Camera | Exposure |
| Panasonic S5 II | Waveform, Zebras, Histogram, Meter |
| Canon R6 Mark II | Zebras, Histogram, Meter |
| Sony A7 IV | Zebras, Histogram, Meter |
Here the Panasonic S5 II (Amazon, B&H) wins with the waveform monitor. Panasonic has always been ahead of the game in this regard.
All three have similar OLED viewfinders and LCDs and in real-world shoots I don’t think it will matter all that much.
The Panasonic S5 II (Amazon, B&H) has a built-in heat dispersion fan system for longer duration recording. The camera will still overheat in modes above 4K. Modes above 4K also have a recording limit of 30 minutes, while in 4K there is no recording limit. This means two things:
- More power draw due to the fan
- More weight due to the fan
| Camera | HDMI Port | Weight (with card and battery) |
| Panasonic S5 II | Type A | 740g |
| Sony A7 IV | Type A | 658g |
| Canon R6 Mark II | Type D | 670g |
For other details like menu, usability, buttons, etc., I’ll have to get my hands on the S5 II to learn more. However, all three camera systems have evolved to better menus and operability over the last few years so I think you’ll be okay with either.

Image Stabilization
All three cameras have 5-axis image stabilization with the best performance coming from native lenses. Without a thorough test it’s hard to say which is better, though from initial reports it seems the Panasonic S5 II (Amazon, B&H), being the most modern system, is also the best.
Batteries and media cards
Here’s a look at the media:
| Camera | Dual card slots | Price per GB for 512 GB* |
| Panasonic S5 II | Yes, SDHC/SDXC, UHS-II | $0.63/GB |
| Sony A7 IV | Yes, CFexpress Type A or UHS-II SD Card | $2.49/GB and $0.63/GB |
| Canon R6 Mark II | Yes, SDHC/SDXC, UHS-II | $0.63/GB |
CFexpress cards are not cheap (comparing Sandisk Extreme Pro to be fair). For practical shoots, you will need multiple cards. This could really add to your budget. With the Sony a7 IV, you can use CFExpress or UHS-II, which is a huge relief.
What about battery life?
| Camera | Battery life | Cost one one battery | Cost of 6 hours of operation |
| Panasonic S5 II | 45 minutes | $67.50 | $540 |
| Sony A7 IV | 110 minutes | $78 | $255 |
| Canon R6 II | 120 minutes | $79 | $237 |
The added fan also increases power draw and this affects the S5 II.
Which is cheaper to own?
Let’s just add up the costs:
| Camera | Sony A7 IV | Panasonic S5 II | Canon R6 Mark II |
| Camera body | $2,498 | $1,999 | $2,499 |
| Media and Accessories | Tie | Tie | Tie |
| Batteries | $255 | $540 | $237 |
| Total | $2,753 | $2539 | $2,736 |
The S5 II looked cheaper, but with added battery usage the gap is narrower. Now you know why we’re comparing the three.
Recap
Who wins each feature?
| Feature | Winner |
| Sensor and ISO | Sony A7 IV |
| Video features | Sony A7 IV |
| DR and Color | Sony A7 IV |
| Rolling Shutter | TBD |
| Exposure Aids | Panasonic S5 II |
| Media | Tie |
| Lenses | Tie |
| Ergonomics | TBD |
| Ports and Monitoring | Panasonic S5 II |
| Audio | Tie |
| Autofocus | Canon R6 Mark II |
| Battery life | Tie |
Before we take our final decision, we’ll let the cameras tell us what they offer that the others don’t:
| Camera | USP | Major Cons |
| Panasonic SS II | Unlimited recording time in 4K | Battery life, weight, cost of lenses |
| Canon R6 Mark II | 4K 60p in Full frame | Overheating |
| Sony A7 IV | 7K oversampled, 240 fps in 1080p, low light performance | Overheating |

My Verdict
I said I’ll try to provide a balanced overview, even though it’s hard. Here’s what I think:
| Type of Filmmaking | Preferred Camera | Major Reasons |
|---|---|---|
| Documentaries and corporate videos | Sony A7 IV | Low light performance, battery life and 240 fps |
| Short or feature films | Canon R6 Mark II | Full frame in 4K and 60 fps |
| Music Videos | Sony A7 IV | Low light performance, battery life and 240 fps |
| Journalism | Sony A7 IV | Low light performance, battery life and 240 fps |
| Wildlife | Sony A7 IV | Low light performance, battery life and 240 fps |
| Weddings and Events | Sony A7 IV | Low light performance, battery life and 240 fps |
Even though the Canon R6 Mark II (Amazon, B&H) leads the Sony A7 IV (Amazon, B&H) in fictional work, the gap is a lot narrower if you don’t care about full frame mode in 60p.
The Panasonic S5 II (Amazon, B&H), with all its advancements, falls behind, unfortunately. It’s probably a capable camera, but I can’t recommend it over the other two.
Overall, the Sony A7 IV (Amazon, B&H) wins.
What do you think?
Great comparison and detailed explanations. Thank you for actually picking a ‘winner’ – a lot of reviewers ‘chicken out’ and say “it depends”. Appreciate the time and effort you put into these comparisons.
You’re welcome!
Thanks for your input.
You’re welcome!