In Part One we covered the ergonomics and specifications of the Sony A7s. In this part we’ll cover prime lenses used in still cameras. In later parts, we’ll cover cine primes and zooms as well.

Why would anyone use still primes for video? Here are some good reasons:

  • They are (or were) designed to resolve great detail, so 4K is a piece of cake.
  • They are cheap!
  • They are easy to buy and maintain.
  • They are light.

 
In fact, if you’re on a budget but still demand great quality and are happy to live with the compromises, then I highly recommend still primes for the Sony A7s.

Sigma 50mm Art

Warning: Information and prices provided in this article and guide might be inaccurate or wrong, even if I have tried to be as accurate as possible without losing sanity. You are responsible for your own actions. Refer to manufacturers’ manuals and data for accurate information and prices.

The problem of plenty

The Sony A7s has a full frame E mount, sometimes called the FE mount as well. The most revolutionary aspect of the Sony E mount is that its flange focal distance is one of the lowest possible for full frame sensors. This means, you can practically use any full frame lens on it, as long as there is a suitable adapter.

Here’s a comparison of various mounts compared to the E mount. We are comparing flange focal distance (FFD), aperture ring, image stabilization, adapters, replacement parts and whether or not the mounts offer a full range of prime lenses:

Mount ~ FFD in mm Ap. Ring IS^ Adapter # Replace /Parts^^ Full Range*
Sony E (FE) 18 No No No E No
Sony FZ 18 No No No H No
Leica M 27.8 Yes No M E Yes
Canon Manual FD 42 Yes No M NE Yes
Canon EOS EF 44 No Yes E E Yes
Minolta/ Sony A 44.5 No No E E Yes
Pentax K Manual 45.46 Yes No M NE Yes
Nikon F (D and G) 46.5 Yes (D) Yes (G) M (D), E (G) E Yes
Leica R 47 Yes No M NE Yes
Arri PL** 52 Yes No M NE No**

[BestPostBanner468]

Notes:

  • ^Image Stabilization in lens
  • ^^How hard is it to replace a lens or fix it with parts? E- Easy, NE-Not Easy, H-Hard and/or Expensive
  • *A full range of prime lenses – from 21mm to 135mm in at least f/2.8
  • **Most PL lenses are designed for Super35mm frames, and not full frame. Very few samples of the top-of-the-line Arri and Cooke lenses will cover a full frame sensor. There is also the problem of adapters (next section).
  • #What kind of adapter will be required. M-Manual, E-Electronic for Aperture, Autofocus, etc.
  • ~I’m not covering medium format lenses, though they are also acceptable. Examples include Contax/Yashica/Mamiya/Hasselblad/Fuji etc. The ‘problem’ with medium format is that the focal lengths and apertures don’t correspond to what people are used to normally. That, and the fact that these lenses will be heavier, without the equivalent aperture advantage, gives them an ergonomic disadvantage.

 
Problems with each mount summed up:

Mount Problems
Sony E (FE) Full range of lenses not available
Sony FZ ditto
Leica M Too expensive, no super wide options
Canon Manual FD No IS option
Canon EOS EF No aperture ring
Minolta/Sony A No aperture ring
Pentax K Manual No IS
Nikon F (D and G) Have to choose IS vs aperture ring
Leica R Too expensive
Arri PL** Very few full frame options

Native Sony E mount lenses are too few to count. Here’s the Sony/Zeiss roadmap for prime lenses in this mount:

Sony FE roadmap

Here are the prime lenses lined up for 2014-2015:

  • Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 ZA
  • Zeiss FE 24mm f/2.0 ZA
  • Zeiss FE 135mm f/2.0 ZA
  • Zeiss FE 21mm f/2.8 ZA
  • Sony FE 35mm f/2.0G OSS
  • Zeiss 50mm f/1.2 ZA

 
Of course, the sad part is, you have to wait till the end of 2015 for the full set. Secondly, if the 55mm f/1.8 costs $998 how much will the 50mm f/1.2 cost?

Cost is also a factor for both Leica mounts, as well as the PL mount, and even the Sony A mount lenses (at least the newer ones). Leica M has one great benefit – the lenses are much smaller and lighter due to the smaller focal flange distance.

Now, if you already own prime lenses for any of the above mounts, you should purchase an adapter (next section) for that mount and get on with it. The lenses themselves have different character, and they are a matter of personal taste. I wouldn’t fault a single mount on any technicality, only convenience.

However, if you are building your kit from scratch, you should be extremely careful about selecting a set of prime lenses. After studying the above chart, my three top choices for a ‘kit’ are the EF mount, the FD mount and the Nikon F mount.

My personal favorite? I feel the best bet is the Nikon F system. It is the only mount that ticks all boxes:

  • You want aperture ring and image stabilization? No problem.
  • You want to use cheaper lenses or more expensive ones? No problem.
  • It has a flange focal distance that makes it adaptable to even Canon cameras if the need ever arises in the future.
  • Great prime lenses are available for cheap. Thankfully, Nikon has hardly changed their SLR mount, and you’ll never have a shortage of lenses.
  • Not only do Nikon primes come in all focal lengths, you have various choices of year (like wine!) and model.

 
You won’t regret siding with Nikon on this one.

[BestPostBanner468]

List of adapters for the Sony A7s

Just in case you feel like going with another mount (or even the Nikon mount), here is a list of adapters for each mount (for more information on judging quality of lens adapters, click here.):

Mount Adapters^*
Leica M Metabones, Generic
Canon Manual FD Metabones, Novoflex, Fotodiox, Generic
Canon EOS EF Metabones, Generic
Minolta/Sony A LAEA3, LAEA4, Novoflex
Pentax K Manual Fotodiox, Generic
Nikon F (D and G) Metabones and Novoflex (G), Generic (D)
Leica R Generic, Metabones, Novoflex
Arri PL** Generic**

Notes:

  • ^Most manual adapters for the Sony NEX (APS-C) mount will work, but be careful when using heavier lenses. Cheaply machined adapters don’t have the mechanics to support heavier metal lenses.
  • *If you need aperture control and auto focus, the adapters tend to get expensive and heavier. Don’t go for the cheapest adapter possible, that’s counter-productive.
  • **There are few lenses that cover the full frame sensor. Generic adapters aren’t usually strong enough to withstand heavy PL lenses, so be extra careful. Look for the ones that say PL to FZ mount.

 
Again, I prefer the adapters for the Nikon F to E system. If you have the cash, a good adapter like the Metabones G ($139) comes with an aperture ring as well. Avoid the Speed Booster, it’s pointless, unless you’re shooting in APS-C mode. In that case, why bother with the Sony A7s full frame camera anyway?

Nikon 135mm f/2

Recommended prime lenses for the Sony A7s

Here are recommended prime lenses from the Nikon stable:

Focal Length Cheap Option Filter Thread (mm) Approx Price
Fish-eye Sigma 15mm f/2.8 None $609
Nikon 16mm f/2.8D None $899
Wide Samyang 14mm f/2.8 None $399
Nikon 14mm f/2.8D None $1,399
Zeiss Distagon T* 15mm f/2.8 ZF.2 95 $2,950
Zeiss Distagon T* 18mm F/3.5 ZF.2 82 $1,395
Nikon 20mm f/2.8 62 $675
Zeiss Distagon T* 21mm F/2.8 ZF.2 82 $1,843
Samyang 24mm f/1.4 77 $669
Nikon 24mm f/1.4G 77 $1,879
Zeiss Distagon T* 25mm f/2.0 ZF.2 67 $1,699
Nikon 28mm f/1.8G 67 $697
Zeiss Distagon T* 28mm f/2.0 ZF.2 58 $1,283
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art 67 $899
Normal Nikon 50mm f/1.2 AIS 52 $700
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art 77 $949
Zeiss 55mm f/1.4 Otus 77 $3,990
Nikon Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D 62 $469
Sigma 70mm f/2.8 62 $459
Samyang 85mm f/1.4 72 $299
Nikon 85mm f/1.4D 77 $969
Telephoto Tamron 90mm f/2.8 SP Macro 1:1 58 $749
Tokina 100mm f/2.8 AT-X 55 $399
Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 ZF.2 67 $1,843
Nikon 105mm f/2.0D 72 $1,049
Nikon 135mm f/2.0D 72 $1,150
Sigma 150mm f/2.8 72 $1,099
Nikon 200mm f/4.0D 62 $1,649
Nikon 300mm f/4D 77 $1,134

The lenses marked in bold are my favorites. Don’t forget, you can buy many of these Nikon lenses used in great condition. I’ve only listed new prices.

One problem you’ll have to contend with is the differences in filter diameters. I’ll deal with that later.

In Part Three we will look at cine lenses and zoom lenses for the Sony A7s.

 

3 replies on “The Sony A7s 4K Guide (Part Two): Still Prime Lenses”

  1. JonathonSendall Totally agree with you Jonathan. Zeiss Contax are definitely good contenders. Thank you for pointing it out.

    For those interested, here’s a great rundown:¬†http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?92044-Contax-Zeiss-Survival-Guide

  2. Actully Contax (I have a set of primes) are full frame and would work
    extremely well on the A7S. The glass in the Zeiss Contax is the same as
    the glass in the Zeiss ZE’s but are a third of the price. They’d give
    even the CP.2’s a run for their money in terms of glass quality. The
    barrels have long focus throws but of course being full frame shooting
    with an 85mm at f1.4, focus is critical. When handheld I used to focus
    with my feet rather than on the lens and got quite good at shifting my
    body in and out to keep the eyes in focus or whatever it was. Bokeh is
    very good to as long as you get the right ones (some have a ninja star
    shape bokeh when opened just before f1.4 but dissappear when fully open.

Comments are closed.